This article is the second in The Hill\u2019s three-part \u201cWorld at War\u201d series this week, which also explores public sentiment around the Russia-Ukraine war and simmering tensions with China.<\/p>\n
A broad coalition of progressives and minority voters furious about Israel\u2019s war in Gaza have thrust the Democratic party into a bitter fight \u2014 spurring an internal clash with echoes of the GOP\u2019s growing divide over Ukraine.<\/p>\n
While voters remain largely focused on domestic issues and the economy, both wars have forced 2024 candidates to publicly navigate vexing questions about U.S. foreign policy and military posture, with potential consequences to their support.<\/p>\n
President Biden and former President Trump, the most likely 2024 nominees in their respective parties, must now contend with these global conflicts in their own vision for America\u2019s role in the world.<\/p>\n
\u201cTrump and Biden are trying to replace the old Cold War mentality with a new one,\u201d said Michael Genovese, who heads the Global Policy Institute at Loyola Marymount University. \u201cTrump\u2019s was America first, that was kind of an isolation glove, and Biden\u2019s is democracy \u2014 and that hasn\u2019t developed legs among voters.\u201d<\/p>\n
While the two presidents are largely aligned in backing Israel\u2019s retaliatory war against Hamas over the Oct. 7 terrorist attacks, they are deeply split on Ukraine in its war against Russia\u2019s invading forces.<\/p>\n
Genovese said the U.S. is still struggling to find its foreign policy direction after the cold war. And he said the debate playing out over Gaza and Ukraine today could have a major impact on long-term U.S. national security \u2014 especially when the U.S. has designated China as its biggest threat.<\/p>\n
\u201cToday, we\u2019re all over the map and we have no coherent foreign policy,\u201d he said. \u201cThat can open the door for others \u2014 fill in the blank with China \u2014 to exploit that.\u201d<\/p>\n
While Ukraine has seen a slow buildup of GOP resistance, the Israel-Hamas war is quickly escalating tensions among Democrats.<\/p>\n
A broad section of younger Democrats, progressives, Arab Americans and other minority groups say there is a double standard between supporting Ukraine against Russia and backing Israel in a destructive campaign to destroy Hamas.<\/p>\n
\u201cAmericans have become highly polarized on Israel,\u201d said Shibley Telhami, a nonresident senior fellow at the Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution. \u201cPalestine used to be one of the issues that escaped polarization in America. But it no longer is.\u201d<\/p>\n
Telhami said the divisions are growing wide enough to endanger Biden\u2019s support in his own party \u2014 even among constituents united against Trump, his likely Republican opponent in 2024.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is what I call an image-shaping problem. People are making an assessment. Who is Joe Biden, and is Joe Biden someone we trust? Is Joe Biden someone we want to lead?\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s a big question. And I think [the war] has reshaped people\u2019s views of Biden.\u201d<\/p>\n
Biden faced an internal revolt, in which more than 500 government employees across the administration signed a letter protesting the president\u2019s policy on the war.<\/p>\n
And more broadly, about 55 percent of Americans disapprove of Biden\u2019s handling of the Middle East amid the Israel-Hamas war, according to a November Marist poll. An NBC poll recorded a similar disapproval of the president\u2019s handling of the war, while Biden\u2019s approval ratings sunk to 40 percent, the lowest level of his presidency.<\/p>\n
Leading GOP candidates, including Trump, are very pro-Israel as well, further complicating predictions about how the issue might impact the 2024 elections.<\/p>\n
But warning signs for Biden have already sounded. In Michigan, a swing state home to a large number of Arab American voters, early polling showed Trump is leading Biden in a key state the Democrat won in 2020.<\/p>\n
Hanna Hanania, a former board member with the U.S. Palestinian Council, said Democrats should beware of Arab Americans voting for alternatives to both Trump and Biden.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey feel they have to send a message to the Democratic establishment,\u201d Hanania said. \u201cThis is going to be more of a protest vote.\u201d<\/p>\n
While Biden has firmly backed continuing support to both Ukraine and Israel, despite the rising criticism, more Republicans are trying to meet voters where they are on Ukraine.<\/p>\n
A Reuters\/Ipsos poll in October revealed that just 41 percent of Americans support arming Ukraine, down from 65 percent in a June survey. Among Republicans, support dropped from 56 percent to 35 percent in the same period.<\/p>\n
While most Republicans have continued to support Ukraine aid, \u2018no\u2019 votes have steadily increased over the past year, and there is significant GOP resistance to Biden\u2019s request for $60 billion in additional support for Kyiv.<\/p>\n
In the Republican presidential race, just two of the leading GOP candidates enthusiastically back Ukraine: former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. Both Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis have largely focused on their desire to end the war, without getting into details of a peace deal, while entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy is the race\u2019s leading Ukraine skeptic.<\/p>\n
Alp Sevimlisoy, a millennium fellow at the Atlantic Council and Western security expert, said how Americans ultimately move on both Israel and Ukraine is key to U.S. international interests and standing with allies.<\/p>\n
He characterized the Democratic fight over Israel as a \u201cbattle between moderates and progressives\u201d on social policies that have been \u201cextrapolated onto foreign policy,\u201d which is at the same time meeting isolationist Republican skepticism of U.S. interests overseas.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe similarity here is that both of these positions are of no benefit to the strength of the U.S. and the strength of NATO, as well as our allies abroad,\u201d Sevimlisoy said.<\/p>\n
Public polling this month laid bare the extent of the divide in the Democratic party as well as the overall decline of American support for Israel \u2014 and Biden \u2014 since the war began in October.<\/p>\n
After the Palestinian militant group Hamas launched its deadly surprise attack that killed 1,200 Israelis, American public support was strong. Hamas also kidnapped about 240 people, about 10 of whom were Americans.<\/p>\n
The October Ipsos poll showed that 41 percent of Americans said the U.S. should support Israel. But after an unprecedented Israeli bombing campaign on Gaza, the blockade of humanitarian aid to the strip and a ground invasion that has left more than 13,000 Palestinians dead, support has declined significantly.<\/p>\n
Calls for the U.S. to be a neutral mediator rose from 27 percent In October to 39 percent in November. And roughly two-thirds of Americans now back a cease-fire, which Biden has refused to support, instead seeking targeted pauses in fighting to protect civilians and provide aid.<\/p>\n
The conflict is highly partisan. A plurality of Democrats say Israel has overreached in the war against Hamas, the opposite of GOP voters, and Democrats are less likely to view Israel favorably than Republicans.<\/p>\n
Chris Jackson, senior vice president of U.S. public affairs at Ipsos, said Americans have quickly consumed more information about the war and have moved into a \u201cstop the conflict\u201d position after seeing images of the brutality and suffering in Gaza.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd I think it links to a larger trend that we\u2019ve seen since last year, where Americans have been sort of pulling inward a little bit, getting a little bit more isolationist,\u201d he said, mentioning Republicans softening on Ukraine.<\/p>\n
Public policy analysts say the Ukraine-splintering in the GOP stems from the \u201cAmerica First\u201d view that was championed by Trump, which contrasts with Reagan-era assertions of U.S. strength overseas, while Democrats are breaking apart over Israel because of an existing divide that has now magnified between progressives and moderates.<\/p>\n
Both are symptomatic of a more dynamic and challenging world that has no \u201cone common enemy we can all unite around,\u201d even China, said Matt Zierler, a foreign policy professor at James Madison College.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re in a much more complex world today,\u201d Zierler said. \u201cThat\u2019s making it harder for politicians to craft a message \u2026 [and] to have a clear, simple way of describing their worldview.\u201d<\/p>\n
Zierler pointed to the Israel-Hamas war as an example, which he said is \u201ccomplicated in its roots\u201d and complex in the \u201cpossible solutions\u201d to end the war.<\/p>\n
The widening disagreements on the U.S.\u2019s handling of the Israel-Hamas conflict have played out in a more dramatic fashion than those over Ukraine, with protests unfolding across American cities and suburbs. Pro-Palestinian protesters and pro-Israel marchers have clashed in some places, and they have even accidentally killed one another.<\/p>\n
Israel has enjoyed broad support in the U.S. as a major ally in the Middle East since the state was created in 1948 and displaced the Palestinian people. But over time, Democrats have grown more sympathetic to Palestinians.<\/p>\n
Forty-one percent of Democrats said their sympathies lie more with the Palestinians in the current conflict, according to a November Quinnipiac poll. That\u2019s a complete reversal from a majority supporting Israel in October.<\/p>\n
Among Democrats aged 18 to 34 years old, that number is even higher: 52 percent say their sympathies lie more with the Palestinians, and a strong majority of younger Democratic voters also disapprove of Israel\u2019s response in Gaza and say the U.S. should not support the country in its fight against Hamas.<\/p>\n
Tim Malloy, a polling analyst at Quinnipiac, attributed the decline of Israel support among younger Democrats partly to social media, where many of them get their information and where they are finding videos and images highlighting the destruction of Gaza.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey\u2019ve taken an even deeper dive backwards,\u201d he said, referring to young voters\u2019 opinions since the war started. \u201cIt\u2019s there and it\u2019s glaring. Younger voters have more sympathy for people in Gaza than they do for Israelis.\u201d<\/p>\n
The current spending battle playing out in Congress is likely to show whether party leaders are still able to summon majority support for both Ukraine and Israel.<\/p>\n
Over the summer, about 70 Republicans in the House voted against a Ukraine aid amendment. That went up to 100 in September on a similar vote.<\/p>\n
Democrats have maintained near unity over Ukraine, and so far only a few dozen have departed from Biden\u2019s position on Israel. So far, just 33 lawmakers in the House have pushed for a cease-fire, most of them progressives, along with three senators.<\/p>\n
Michael Koplow, senior research fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute and chief policy officer at the Israel Policy Forum, said he was not concerned about a \u201cbig exodus\u201d in the Democratic party over the war in Gaza \u2014 at least not immediately.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf I am the Israeli government, I would be worried in the long term of what U.S. policy is going to look like 20 or 30 years from now, if these trends continue,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt would be foolish not to expect some sort of changes in U.S. policy as a result down the road. But I also think that that type of polling question, asked in the middle of an Israeli operation in Gaza, is going to yield different results than if you ask that question a year from now, or five years from now.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n